QUOTE(buzasparta @ 15 Jun 2015, 19:55)
Nene nu vorbim de puhavi care mai bine ii sari decat sa-i ocolesti, vorbim de niste aratari delea cu blugi de femei stramti si tricou care sta ca pe gard, costelivi si cu tate de unde dracu mancare prea multa?Daca nu crezi mergi pe holuri pe la Parhon si te uita putin pe acolo.Ai sa vezi oameni cu probleme si fara sa bage rulouri de fleica cu muschi si asezonate cu garnitura de jumeri.
Normal că acolo găsești pentru că acolo se strâng. Dacă oamenii chiar au probleme acolo se vor duce, dar nu este o problemă generală. Dacă mă duc la oncologie, trag concluzia că toată lumea are cancer?
QUOTE(buzasparta @ 15 Jun 2015, 19:55)
Si nu confunda rasa de carne cu bagat toate rahaturile sa creasca mai repede.
Adică, există rasa de carne, care crește la o lună cât puiul normal în 3 luni, dar vrei să spui că avicola ia puiul normal și angajează oameni să îi fugărească să îi injecteze pe fiecare? Dau bani și pe hormoni și pe angajați ca să aibă randament mai mic?
Poți băga hormoni într-un pechinez dar n-o s-ajungă niciodată cât un dog german. Este identic și cu păsările.
"Growth hormones are proteins, similar to insulin that is used to treat diabetes. As people with diabetes well know,
no oral form of insulin exists that can be taken to avoid all those insulin injections. Insulin taken in oral form would be
broken down in the digestive tract just as any other protein is broken down and would not be effective. If protein growth hormones were given orally to chickens via the feed, they would be broken down in the digestive tract and rendered ineffective."
"There are three main reasons for the rapid growth rate we see in today's commercial poultry but none of them is related to hormones.
The first, mentioned previously, is
the success of primary breeder companies in selecting the best birds for growth and performance. For the past several decades, geneticists have been able to cut roughly one day per year off the time it takes to reach a specified target weight. They have benefited from the short generation interval (lifespan) of the chicken, allowing them to make huge strides in a short period of time. Genetic improvement in the pork and beef industries comes much slower because of the increased generation interval and the time it takes to recognise genetic variation and improvement.
Second is research related to nutritional requirements of the bird. We now know exactly what we should be feeding different genetic strains and birds are kept to specific target weights in terms of energy, protein, vitamins and minerals to optimise performance and growth.
Third, we better understand the kind of environment the bird needs to make the most of the genetic and nutritional potential it has. This includes providing the proper temperature, air quality, ventilation, lighting and feeder and drinker space to obtain optimum performance. The right environment, coupled with high-quality feed and superior genetics, yields a bird that does not require and would not benefit from growth hormones."
"Therefore, like insulin in humans, growth hormones given to chickens would have to be injected to be effective. And to further complicate matters, research indicates that, to be administered successfully,
chickens would need to receive growth hormone injections several times each day (Czarick and Fairchild, 2012). This undertaking is logistically impossible. Most broiler growers have 20,000 or more chickens in each house and numerous houses on the farm. There is no way to catch each chicken in every broiler house numerous times a day and give it a hormone injection. Besides, modern broilers have been genetically selected by primary breeder companies to grow to their physiological limit. The fact is, chickens grow as fast as they should naturally, without the use of growth hormones. Additionally, using hormones to force chickens to grow too quickly would cause increased leg problems and even early death."
Surse vegetale conțin mai mulți hormoni decât cele animale
http://www.thepoultrysite.com/articles/281...-the-confusion/QUOTE(buzasparta @ 15 Jun 2015, 19:55)
Daca nu au nici un efect de ce sunt contra toti astia de sunt ei mari profesori doctori pe la facultatile de medicina?Aia de la Parhon or fi niste strungari recalificati.
E plin și de medici care sunt împotriva vaccinurilor, și nu-s niște incapabili dar încearcă să își propage o părere personală la care au ajuns fără să se intereseze înainte. Îți arăt și medici care spun că mai bine te rogi decât să te duci la ei.