QUOTE(marktwingolondon @ 27 Apr 2007, 21:35)
Since I have decided to swap out my engine with a better one, could you tell me which conversion would work better?
I was troubled whether to go for the 1.2 16v, same engine as mine, but with twin cam distribution and 75 "blessed" BHP, or the 1.4 16v, that in some new versions has 100BHP
What are the main differences between the two? Which one would you suggest and why?
You better get the 1.2 16v 75 BHP: it will probably work very good with the actual rest of the car. With 1.4 16v 100 BHP you'll probably have to change the clutch, brakes, exhaust system, gearbox... you get the ideea.
Don't expect very much from the 1.2 16v engine. It will go faster (higher top speed), but it will be a little bit lezier than the actual 1.2 8v at low rpm (under 1500 rpm, all 16v engines have that). Near and over 2000 rpm, the 16v engine feels very good. Over 4000 rpm it's a small Beast
. I compared 1.4 8v and 1.4 16v engines on the same body (Clio II) and I felt exactly as I mentioned. I thing it worth the upgrade.
Good luck.